top of page

References

Please find attached the references in this downloadable PDF

Andrews-Hanna, J. (2011). The Brain’s Default Network and Its Adaptive Role in Internal Mentation. The Neuroscientist, 18(3), 251-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073858411403316

​

Anthropomorphism | Psychology Today. (2017). Psychology Today. Retrieved 18 October 2017, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/anthropomorphism

​

Armitage, C., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta- analytic review. British Journal Of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939

​

Buckner, R., Andrews-Hanna, J., & Schacter, D. (2008). The Brain's Default Network. Annals Of The New York Academy Of Sciences, 1124(1), 1-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011

​

Chan, A. (2012). Erratum to: Anthropomorphism as a conservation tool. Biodiversity And Conservation, 21(11), 2999-2999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0367-2

​

Crawford, C. (2017). Mental Modules | Interactive Storytelling Tools for Writers | Chris Crawford. Erasmatazz.com. Retrieved 18 November 2017, from http://www.erasmatazz.com/library/the-mind/history-of- thinking/033d91601d1f41bdbb9d/mental-modules.html

 

Dennett, D. (1971). Intentional Systems. Journal Of Philosophy, 68(4), 87-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025382

Kelly, R. The fifth beginning (p. 39). Univ of California Press.

​

Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind. London: Thames and Hudson.

​

Spreng, R., & Andrews-Hanna, J. (2015). The Default Network and Social Cognition. Brain Mapping, 165-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00173-1

​

Urquiza-Haas, E., & Kotrschal, K. (2015). The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: attribution of mental states to other species. Animal Behaviour, 109, 167-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.011

​

Veríssimo, D., Vaughan, G., Ridout, M., Waterman, C., MacMillan, D., & Smith, R. (2017). Increased conservation marketing effort has major fundraising benefits for even the least popular species. Biological Conservation, 211, 95-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.018 

bottom of page